> On 10 Dec 2019, at 16:08, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Support by usage name can be considered separately (with a 'usage' > attribute?). > > Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/formatsecret.html.in | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/formatsecret.html.in b/docs/formatsecret.html.in > index 8d0630a7c3..8f5383cf64 100644 > --- a/docs/formatsecret.html.in > +++ b/docs/formatsecret.html.in > @@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ Secret value set > of the vTPM. > The <code><usage type='vtpm'></code> element must contain > a single <code>name</code> element that specifies a usage name > - for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID or by > - this usage name via the <code><encryption></code> element of > + for the secret. The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID > + via the <code><encryption></code> element of > a <a href="formatdomain.html#elementsTpm">tpm</a> when using an > emulator. > <span class="since">Since 5.6.0</span>. The following is an example > -- > 2.24.0.308.g228f53135a Reminds me of our discussion :-) Reviewed-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
