Re: [PATCH RFC V2] guests: Add support for openSUSE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrea,

> It sounds like we can just provide install= unconditionally, same as
> we currently do with ks=? We'd have to verify doing so doesn't cause
> any unintended side-effects for existing guest types.

I'd rather have it done in a more explicit way, just for the sake of
someone else trying to debug / understand the code later on.

>
> (Incidentally, didn't CentOS 8 also require passing the installation
> URL explicitly based on your tests, or something like that?

That's a different issue. :-)
CentOS 8 explicitly requires the URL to be set in the kickstart file.
That's another issue, to be solved another day ...

> We need
> to get around to adding that OS to CI too at some point O:-)

... most likely when we add CentOS 8 VMs. :-)

> >
> > An important question ... can't we have / use a CentOS 8 machine?
> > Would be lovely to not have to work those issues around on lcitool.
>
> I'd love that as well, but I'm afraid that's out of our hands since
> the CentOS CI machines are handled by the CentOS CI folks... We could
> try asking nicely and see what happens :) But in the short term
> having a workaround in lcitool is definitely the way to go.

I see.


--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux