On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:29:27PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:22:09PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:12:00PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > src/internal.h | 6 ++---- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/internal.h b/src/internal.h > > > index 5b0a2335f5..0ff9f496ac 100644 > > > --- a/src/internal.h > > > +++ b/src/internal.h > > > @@ -86,10 +86,8 @@ > > > #define STRCASEPREFIX(a, b) (c_strncasecmp(a, b, strlen(b)) == 0) > > > #define STRSKIP(a, b) (STRPREFIX(a, b) ? (a) + strlen(b) : NULL) > > > > > > -#define STREQ_NULLABLE(a, b) \ > > > - ((a) ? (b) && STREQ((a), (b)) : !(b)) > > > -#define STRNEQ_NULLABLE(a, b) \ > > > - ((a) ? !(b) || STRNEQ((a), (b)) : !!(b)) > > > +#define STREQ_NULLABLE(a, b) (g_strcmp0(a, b) == 0) > > > +#define STRNEQ_NULLABLE(a, b) (g_strcmp0(a, b) != 0) > > > > Why not use g_strcmp0 directly? > > The same reason we never used strcmp() in the first place - it is > easier to read STREQ vs strcmp == 0 / strcmp != 0. Right, I was looking at g_str_equal() which returns gboolean and for some reason didn't realized that g_strcmp0 returns int. Only if there would be g_str_equal0(). Pavel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
