On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 13:15:19 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 05:34:47PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > >Let's store qemuMonitorCPUDefInfo directly in the array of CPUs in > >qemuMonitorCPUDefs rather then using an array of pointers. > > > >Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > > >Notes: > > Version 2: > > - trivial rebase > > > > src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 14 +++++++------- > > src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 5 ++--- > > src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 2 +- > > src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 7 +------ > > tests/qemumonitorjsontest.c | 8 ++++---- > > 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > @@ -3573,7 +3572,7 @@ qemuMonitorCPUDefsNew(size_t count) > g_autoptr(qemuMonitorCPUDefs) defs = NULL; > > defs = g_new0(qemuMonitorCPUDefs, 1); > - defs->cpus = g_new0(qemuMonitorCPUDefInfoPtr, count); > + defs->cpus = g_new0(qemuMonitorCPUDefInfo, count); > defs->ncpus = count; > return g_steal_pointer(&defs); > } Looks like a change in something that doesn't exist yet :-) -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
