On 10/14/19 3:12 AM, Li Feng wrote: > Hi Cole & Michal, > > I'm sorry for my late response, I just end my journey today. > Thank your response, your suggestion is very helpful to me. > > I have added Michal in this mail, Michal helps me review my initial patchset. > (https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/libvir/msg191339.html) > Whoops I missed that posting, I didn't realize you had sent patches! > All concern about this feature is the XML design. > My original XML design exposes more details of Qemu. > > <vhost-user-blk-pci type='unix'> > <source type='bind' path='/tmp/vhost-blk.sock'> > <reconnect enabled='yes' timeout='5' /> > </source> > <queue num='4'/> > </vhost-user-blk-pci> > > As Cole's suggestion, the better design with all vhost-user-scsi/blk > features would like this: > > vhost-user-blk: > > <disk type='vhostuser' device='disk'> > <source type='unix' path='/path/to/vhost-user-blk.sock' mode='client'> > <reconnect enabled='yes' timeout='5' /> > </source> > <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> > <queue num='4'/> > <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/> > </disk> > > vhost-user-scsi: > > <disk type='vhostuser' device='disk'> > <source type='unix' path='/path/to/vhost-user-scsi.sock' mode='client'> > <reconnect enabled='yes' timeout='5' /> > </source> > <target dev='sda' bus='scsi'/> > <queue num='4'/> > </disk> > I think my SCSI idea is wrong, sorry. vhost-user-scsi is for passing a scsi host adapter to the VM, correct? If so, then it's not really a <disk>, and so using the existing vhost-scsi support in <hostdev> is probably better. <hostdev> could possible be used for vhost-user-blk as well Can you provide some examples of full qemu command lines using vhost-user-blk and vhost-user-scsi? Just linking to examples else where is fine, but I'm wondering if there's more context Internally we already have an abstraction for vhost-scsi: <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='scsi_host'> <source protocol='vhost' wwpn='XXX'/> </hostdev> The obvious extension would be <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='scsi_host'> <source protocol='vhostuser' type='unix' path='/path/to/vhost-user-scsi.sock' mode='client'/> </hostdev> Internally implementing this will be weird. The <source> parameters are only dictated by the hostdev type= field, but in this case they would be dictated by the <source protocol=> field, and we would want to reuse the internal chardev abstraction. vhost-user-blk could be implemented similarly, but with type='storage' which is the way we pass through block devices to LXC guests, but it isn't currently supported in the qemu driver. I dunno. Maybe Michal or danpb can provide guidance > Conclusion: > 1. Add new type(vhostuser) for disk label; > 2. Add queue sub-label for disk to support multiqueue(<queue > num='4'/>) or reusing the driver label > (<driver name='vhostuser' queues='4'), which one is better? > Qemu support multiqueue like this: > -device vhost-user-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,chardev=spdk_vhost_scsi0,num_queues=4 > -device vhost-user-blk-pci,chardev=spdk_vhost_blk0,num-queues=4 > num-queues is already supported by libvirt for both <disk> and <hostdev> with <driver queues=X/>, so whether we use <disk> or <hostdev> you won't need to add any new XML here. > Another question: > When qemu is connecting to a vhost-user-scsi controller[1], there may > exist multiple LUNs under one target, > then one disklabel(<disk/>) will represent multiple SCSI LUNs, > the 'dev' property(<target dev='sda' bus='scsi'/>) will be ignored, right? > In other words, for vhost-user-scsi disk, it more likes a controller, > maybe the controller label is suitable. > Yes you are right, and this was my understanding. But then its not really a <controller> in libvirt's sense because we can't attach emulated devices to it, so it's more a fit for the existing <hostdev> vhost-user support. Unfortunately it's not really a clean fit anywhere, there will have to be some kind of compromise. And I'm not sure if <disk> or <hostdev> is right for vhost-user-blk, but hopefully others have more clear opinions. Thanks, Cole > I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible. > > [1]: https://spdk.io/doc/vhost.html > > Feng Li > > Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2019年10月10日周四 上午6:48写道： >> >> Sorry for the late reply, and thanks Jano for pointing out elsewhere >> that this didn't receive a response. >> >> On 8/12/19 5:56 AM, Li Feng wrote: >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> And I want to add the vhost-user-scsi-pci/vhost-user-blk-pci support >>> for libvirt. >>> >>> The usage in qemu like this: >>> >>> Vhost-SCSI >>> -chardev socket,id=char0,path=/var/tmp/vhost.0 >>> -device vhost-user-scsi-pci,id=scsi0,chardev=char0 >>> Vhost-BLK >>> -chardev socket,id=char1,path=/var/tmp/vhost.1 >>> -device vhost-user-blk-pci,id=blk0,chardev=char1 >>> >> >> Indeed that matches what I see for the qemu commits too: >> >> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=00343e4b54b >> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=f12c1ebddf7 >> >>> What type should I add for libvirt. >>> Type1: >>> <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='vhost-user'> >>> <source protocol='vhost-user-scsi' path='/tmp/vhost-scsi.sock'></source> >>> <alias name="vhost-user-scsi-disk1"/> >>> </hostdev> >>> >>> >>> Type2: >>> >>> <disk type='network' device='disk'> >>> <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none' io='native'/> >>> <source protocol='vhost-user' path='/tmp/vhost-scsi.sock'> >>> </source> >>> <target dev='sdb' bus='vhost-user-scsi'/> >>> <boot order='3'/> >>> <alias name='scsi0-0-0-1'/> >>> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='1'/> >>> </disk> >>> >>> >>> <disk type='network' device='disk'> >>> <driver name='qemu' type='raw' cache='none' io='native'/> >>> <source protocol='vhost-user' path='/tmp/vhost-blk.sock'> >>> </source> >>> <target dev='vda' bus='vhost-user-blk'/> >>> <boot order='1'/> >>> <alias name='virtio-disk0'/> >>> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' >>> function='0x0'/> >>> </disk> >>> >> >> I think wiring this into <disk> makes more sense. <hostdev> is really an >> abstraction for assigning a (typically) physical host device to the VM, >> so it handles things like hiding a PCI device from the host, and passing >> that exact device to the VM. >> >> In the vhost-user-scsi/blk case, the host device is just a special >> process running on the other side of a socket, and the device >> represented to the guest is a typical virtio device. So to me it makes >> more sense as a <disk> with a <source> that points at that socket. >> >> target bus=virtio vs bus=scsi is already used to distinguish between >> virtio-blk and virtio-scsi, so I think we can keep that bit as is, with >> the <address type=drive|pci> to match. We just need to differentiate >> between plain virtio and vhost-user >> >> network devices already have vhostuser support: >> >> <interface type='vhostuser'> >> <source type='unix' path='/tmp/vhost1.sock' mode='server|client'/> >> <model type='virtio'/> >> </interface> >> >> Internally that <source> is a virDomainChrSourceDefPtr which is our >> internal representation of a chardev. So I think something akin to this >> is the way to go. It will likely require updating a LOT of places in the >> code that check disk type= field, probably most places that care about >> whether type=NETWORK or type=!NETWORK will need to be mirrored for the >> new type. >> >> <disk type='vhostuser' device='disk'> >> <source type='unix' path='/path/to/vhost-user-blk.sock' mode='client'/> >> <target dev='vda' bus='virtio'/> >> </disk> >> >> <disk type='vhostuser' device='disk'> >> <source type='unix' path='/path/to/vhost-user-scsi.sock' mode='client'/> >> <target dev='sda' bus='scsi'/> >> </disk> >> >> - Cole > - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
