On 10/11/19 9:05 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10/7/19 11:49 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
Check explicitly for BACKING_STORE_OK and not its 0 value
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
src/util/virstoragefile.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
index 51726006e7..1549067c48 100644
--- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c
+++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ qcow1GetBackingStore(char **res,
* used to store backing format */
*format = VIR_STORAGE_FILE_AUTO;
ret = qcowXGetBackingStore(res, NULL, buf, buf_size, false);
- if (ret == 0 && *buf == '\0')
+ if (ret == BACKING_STORE_OK && *buf == '\0')
*format = VIR_STORAGE_FILE_NONE;
return ret;
}
We can make qcowXGetBackingStore() return the enum type instead of plain
int. But that can be done in a follow up (trivial) patch. When doing
that, both qcow1GetBackingStore() and qcow2GetBackingStore() and also
getBackingStore() callback can use the same tretement then.
// after seeing future patches
Ah, you're removing some functions, but you get the idea.
FYI I've pushed the series now. I think after everything is applied
there isn't anything left to do here regarding your suggestion? But
correct me if I'm wrong
Thanks,
Cole
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
