On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:52:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
This is a followup to a previous PoC patch I submitted a month ago: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-September/msg00036.html The commit messages in the individual patches given quite a bit of detail, so I'll keep this cover letter brief. In my previous posting I was unhappy with the implications for the RPM packaging, and was considering having this as a separate source repo & RPM. On further investigation such an approach would not in fact solve the RPM packaging problem, because we would still not be using a pure go build toolchain, as we have data files that need installing in the right place. This forced me to actually address the RPM packaging problems that Fedora had with Go when used from a build tool like make or meson. After alot of debugging I finally got a viable solution merged into the Fedora go-rpm-macros package: https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/c/67b4fbbbfce0986ac46cd1329bf85a18ea7a43d2 commit 67b4fbbbfce0986ac46cd1329bf85a18ea7a43d2 Author: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Sep 18 16:49:58 2019 +0100 macros: define a %gobuildflags macro Using the %gobuild macro is fine for a project where the go code is the only thing being built, and can be built directly by invoking the Go toolchain from RPM. In more complex cases though, the Go code is just a small part of the project and the Go toolchain is invoked by a build system such as make (possibly automake), or meson. In such a case we need to be able to tell this build system what flags to pass to the compiler. The %gobuildflags macros services this purpose allowing a RPM spec todo GOBUILDFLAGS="%gobuildflags" %configure or %make GOBUILDFLAGS="%gobuildflags" Ideally the %gobuild macro would in turn reference the %gobuildflags macro, but that does not appear possible given the semantics around quote expansion and escaping across RPM and shell. Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> As a result in this series, we're now fully integrated into the RPM build, on Fedora at least. I've not checked what approach RHEL takes for Go, whether it requires separate RPM for each 3rd party dep, or prefers bundling. Either way though, we can deal with the problem now. The other obvious change is that this is now a patch series, to make it easier to review the code in managable chunks. The really big difference though is that I replaced the use of XML data files with YAML data files. This was done with the aim of making the data more human friendly. XML is really optimized for machines, not humans, so writing the data files was not pretty. YAML is optimized for human readability, and is actually even easier to consume in Go than the XML was, so its a double win. Finally, we also add new checks at the end for the various CPU hardware side channel mitigations, and report whether SMT/HT is unsafe or not (any Intel host is basically unsafe before Icelake). Daniel P. Berrangé (6): build: introduce logic for using golang in libvirt tools: introduce a data driven impl of virt-host-validate tools: define YAML rules for virt-host-validate checks tools: switch to build the new virt-host-validate impl tools: delete the old virt-host-validate impl tools: make virt-host-validate check CPU vulnerabilities configure.ac | 1 + libvirt.spec.in | 35 +- m4/virt-golang.m4 | 46 ++ m4/virt-host-validate.m4 | 8 +- po/POTFILES | 5 - tools/Makefile.am | 76 +-- tools/host-validate/go.mod | 10 + tools/host-validate/go.sum | 9 + tools/host-validate/main.go | 98 +++ tools/host-validate/pkg/engine.go | 481 ++++++++++++++ tools/host-validate/pkg/facts.go | 585 ++++++++++++++++++ .../pkg/facts_test.go} | 36 +- tools/host-validate/rules/builtin.yaml | 20 + tools/host-validate/rules/cpu.yaml | 50 ++ tools/host-validate/rules/freebsd-kernel.yaml | 77 +++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-acpi.yaml | 39 ++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-cgroups.yaml | 470 ++++++++++++++ .../rules/linux-cpu-hardware-flaws.yaml | 165 +++++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-cpu.yaml | 134 ++++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-devices.yaml | 71 +++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-iommu.yaml | 113 ++++ .../host-validate/rules/linux-namespaces.yaml | 119 ++++ tools/host-validate/rules/linux-pci.yaml | 10 + tools/virt-host-validate-bhyve.c | 77 --- tools/virt-host-validate-common.c | 419 ------------- tools/virt-host-validate-common.h | 85 --- tools/virt-host-validate-lxc.c | 87 --- tools/virt-host-validate-lxc.h | 24 - tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.c | 116 ---- tools/virt-host-validate-qemu.h | 24 - tools/virt-host-validate.c | 152 ----- tools/virt-host-validate.pod | 12 +- 32 files changed, 2609 insertions(+), 1045 deletions(-)
So this ^^ plus: 2 languages added, 0 languages removed makes me feel like this goes against what you were trying to do in another series. I understand that adding new fact checks is "easier" and does not require recompilation, but I don't see any use for that benefit. I went through the cover letters for both series just to find a reason for it and I didn't. Sorry, but I don't really like this.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
