On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 12:10 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:11 AM Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Instead of removing the syntax-check job we can keep it if we use > > 'suite' labels for our tests in a way that we would use 'syntax' label > > for syntax-check tests and 'unit' label for unit tests. > > > > That way the syntax-check job will call > > > > `meson test --suite syntax` > > > > and check job will call > > > > `meson test --suite unit` > > Personally, I don't see a valid point on keeping the job. Same here. Dan was arguing for keeping it, however. I wonder if he changed his mind in the meantime... -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
