Re: [RFC] quirks of interface target device name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/19 3:44 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
I vote for putting a check in virDomainNetDefValidate() that errors out if it finds target dev present but empty. There may be some who would say "it's existing behavior and has been like this for a long time, so we have to preserve it", but since the schema doesn't allow it and we've never documented it, I think it's reasonable to disallow it (except for, as you say, existing domain definitions at reboot time; NB: there will still be an error if a domain containing this now-illegal setting is ever edited).


Or maybe we should just check for empty but non-null target dev directly in the parser and replace it with a NULL right away. That way anybody whose code is accidentally setting it to '' will get the proper default behavior instead of a strange error.


(I wonder if there's any other strings that provoke a different behavior for '' vs null. I think I remember one, but don't recall what it was...)

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux