On 9/14/19 3:44 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > Most code paths prevent starting a blockjob if we already have one but > the job registering function does not do this check. While this isn't a > problem for regular cases we had a bad test case where we registered two > jobs for a single disk which leaked one of the jobs. Prevent this in the > registering function until we allow having multiple jobs per disk. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c b/src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c > index a991309ee7..80d0269128 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_blockjob.c > @@ -143,6 +143,12 @@ qemuBlockJobRegister(qemuBlockJobDataPtr job, > { > qemuDomainObjPrivatePtr priv = vm->privateData; > > + if (disk && QEMU_DOMAIN_DISK_PRIVATE(disk)->blockjob) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR, > + _("disk '%s' has a blockjob assigned"), disk->dst); > + return -1; > + } > + Can the user ever trigger this, in which case OPERATION_FAILED might be a nicer message? ACK series. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list