On 9/5/19 1:57 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
How about we add a paragraph at the end of the section that says something along the lines of Both the lists above are subject to change: code written in a new programming language might be accepted if it's generally agreed that the advantages of using that specific language instead of one of the preferred ones outweight the resulting increase in cognitive load, and that might in turn result in one of more of the preferred languages losing their status; in the same way, languages that have been purged from the project in the past might once again become acceptable, although such a reversal would require an even more impressive cost/benefit ratio. ?
That *definitely* needs more cowbell! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
