On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 15:22 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:24 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > + <change> > > > + <summary> > > > + libxml: min required libxml is now 2.9.1 > > > + </summary> > > > + <description> > > > + Support for building with libxml versions older than 2.9.1 > > > + has been dropped. > > > + </description> > > > + </change> > > > > I don't think we need to document this in the release notes: for > > starters, configure will already complain loudly if libxml on the > > host is too old, same as it does for any other dependency, and > > additionally the version bump is fully in line with our established > > platform support policy. > > I don't agree. This is something I expect to be prominent in any > application's release notes or news. There's no downside to giving > users this information upfront. We have traditionally not done this but alright, I can see how it could be helpful in some scenarios. Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> and safe for freeze. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
