On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 16:38 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 8/27/19 11:17 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > > Since it helps a user to know which of the storage backends support > > what > > operation, include an autogenerated matrix showing it in the docs. > > --- > > .gitignore | 1 + > > docs/Makefile.am | 9 +++-- > > docs/apibuild.py | 2 ++ > > docs/storage.html.in | 14 ++++++++ > > docs/storagebackendstatus.py | 64 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 docs/storagebackendstatus.py > > > > diff --git a/docs/storage.html.in b/docs/storage.html.in > > index e0e4edec1e..2e4f662222 100644 > > --- a/docs/storage.html.in > > +++ b/docs/storage.html.in > > @@ -826,5 +826,19 @@ > > > > <h3>Valid volume format types</h3> > > <p>The valid volume types are the same as for the directory > > pool.</p> > > + > > + <h2>Storage Pool Types implementation status</h2> > > + > > + <p> > > + The storage backends have different level of support of the > > various pool and volume actions. > > + Here is a matrix of the current support for each of them. > > + </p> > > + > > + <p> > > + <strong>Note:</strong> some functions like Start and Stop > > will not trigger an exception when > > + called on a backend that doesn't implement them. > > + </p> > > + > > + <div id="include" filename="storagebackendstatus.htmlinc"/> > > </body> > > </html> > > I feel like this belongs to hvsupport.html better. Do you have any > objection to that? On one hand hvsupport.html indeed lists all the status of each hypervisor. But on the other hand we have a page dedicated to storage... Both options don't seem stupid to me. -- Cedric -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
