Re: [PATCH 1/2] ci: Allow gdb in containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:15:56PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> The gdb requires ptrace capability, but the way we run containers
> now is that they drop every capability. Preserve SYS_PTRACE then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Makes sense to me, so I can give you my:
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>

...but I'd wait and let others to comment.

>  Makefile.ci | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.ci b/Makefile.ci
> index 8857c953b2..977e0445c6 100644
> --- a/Makefile.ci
> +++ b/Makefile.ci
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ CI_ENGINE_ARGS = \
>  	--volume $(CI_HOST_SRCDIR):$(CI_CONT_SRCDIR):z \
>  	--workdir $(CI_CONT_SRCDIR) \
>  	--ulimit nofile=$(CI_ULIMIT_FILES):$(CI_ULIMIT_FILES) \
> +	--cap-add=SYS_PTRACE \
>  	$(NULL)
>
>  ci-check-engine:
> --
> 2.21.0
>
> --
> libvir-list mailing list
> libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux