On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 17:40:51 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 17:11:19 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:55:58AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: [...] > So overall, either we should turn on validation for all our schemas, > or we should require a VALIDATE flag for this new API. Both avoid > special case behaviour with the checkpoint APIs. I definitely do not want to add a new API with no XML validation. Whether we'll require bundling a way bigger change which actually may break existing APPS using invalid XML is worth together with this, I'm not sure. But adding more legacy cruft seems to be pointless.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
