On 7/10/19 4:07 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:12 PM Stefan Berger
<stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To avoid blocking on a write on a pipe that the receiving process
does not read from, write only MAX_PIPE_FEED_BYTES into the pipe
so that we can serve other pipes as well.
why not simply use non-blocking write?
I had thought I would use non-blocking write, but... If we now have a
large buffer and a pipe with less capacity and O_NONBLOCK is set, would
we ever be able to make write progress or always get EAGAIN or
EWOULDBLOCK? Probably what we would need is O_NONBLOCK combined with a
small amount of bytes to write, like in this patch.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
