On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:48:14 +0200 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:45:18PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 14:26:08 +0200 > >Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:03:15PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > >> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:40:23 +0100 > >> > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:47:24PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Hello list, > >> > > > > >> > > > I came across a fundamental flaw in the libvirt user configuration > >> > > > lately and try to find a solution now. Here is the problem: > >> > > > I run several qemu instances on arch linux all configured via libvirt. > >> > > > The default config as user nobody:kvm was fine up to the day I tried > >> > > > to use a host filesystem via 9p. If you want to gain all user rights > >> > > > on the guest inside that fs you have to run qemu as root. So far so > >> > > > good. But if you have several qemus running and only one needs to be > >> > > > root, what to do? You can try to give a -runas by using <qemu:args>. > >> > > > But that does not work, qemu instantly crashes. I think this is > >> > > > because to have _one_ root qemu, you have to configure libvirt to use > >> > > > root user. This means all rights to fs and so on are set to root and > >> > > > this is what lets qemu probably go crazy if dropping root by -runas. > >> > > > The whole thing would be a lot easier and more transparent if the user > >> > > > in libvirt wouldn't be a global config, but instead be part of the > >> > > > domain xml. This way every qemu started could use a different user and > >> > > > have different rights. In my case all but one could be nobody:kvm, and > >> > > > one root:root. This should not be to complicated based on whats > >> > > > already there, is it? > >> > > > >> > > Libvirt needs to know about the user/group QEMU is running at in order to > >> > > ensure it gets given access to the various files it needs to use. If you > >> > > look at the XML of the running guest you should see a <seclabel> > >> > > describing the user/group it is running as currently. > >> > > > >> > > If no <seclabel> is in the offline config, libvirt adds the default > >> > > seclabel, but if you want a different user/group, you can add the > >> > > <seclabel> yourself. > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Daniel > >> > > >> > Hello Daniel, > >> > > >> > well, tried that (as good as the docs are) by adding: > >> > > >> > <seclabel type='dynamic' model='dac'> > >> > <label>nobody:kvm</label> > >> > </seclabel> > >> > > >> > This edit worked in virsh without giving errors. > >> > Starting the domain and then looking into the xml showed: > >> > > >> > <seclabel type='dynamic' model='dac' relabel='yes'/> > >> > > >> > Consequently qemu runs still as root. My user:group setting simply > >> > vanished. > >> > > >> > I think at least some better docs are needed with a striking example of > >> > how to change user and group ... > >> > I may be biased, but how to set user and group is probably the most basic > >> > example of how to use seclabel - and I cannot find one. > >> > >> I agree that the documentation is not the best one. > >> > >> You need to use type='static' relabel='yes': > >> > >> <seclabel type='static' model='dac' relabel='yes'> > >> <label>nobody:kvm</label> > >> </seclabel> > >> > >> To achieve that. > >> > >> In addition if you would like to have only one VM as root:root you > >> should keep the default config as nobody:kvm and use the root:root for > >> that specific VM. > >> > >> Pavel > > > >Hello Pavel, > > > >thank you for taking up the thread, but unfortunately your suggestion does not > >work: > > > >virsh # start collabora > >Fehler: Domain collabora konnte nicht gestartet werden > >Fehler: Interner Fehler: process exited while connecting to monitor: > >2019-07-09T12:34:00.735392Z qemu-system-x86_64: -object > >secret,id=masterKey0,format=raw,file=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/domain-17-collabora/master-key.aes: > >Unable to read /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/domain-17-collabora/master-key.aes: > >Failed to open file > >“/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/domain-17-collabora/master-key.aes”: Permission denied > > > >Obviously this is because "type='static'" means that libvirt does not care > >about setting the user rights for qemu, which then leads to this. > > No, 'static' means you tell libvirt what the label should be, 'dynamic' means > libvirt will generate it automatically. > > >I did think "relabel='yes'" should do that, but does not - or I have a deep > >misunderstanding concerning the seclabel parameters ... > >Thanks for any help to solve this, if there is no bug involved. > > > > Relabel definitely does that and unless there is a bug it uses the seclabel for > the domain. What could be happening is that one of the parent directories is > missing a browse permission for others (the last 'x' in rwxrwxrwx). Could you > run the following commands and reply with the output? > > ls -ld /var/lib/ > ls -ld /var/lib/libvirt/ > ls -ld /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ > > Also what distribution are you using? I remember there were some differences in > packaging related to the directory permissions. > > Martin > > >Dumpxml shows this btw: > > > > <seclabel type='static' model='dac' relabel='yes'> > > <label>nobody:kvm</label> > > </seclabel> > > > >which at least is what was configured. > >-- > >Regards, > >Stephan Hello Martin, thanks for picking up. Here is the output you requested: [root@vserver-a01 /]# ls -ld /var/lib/ drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 10. Jul 00:00 /var/lib/ [root@vserver-a01 /]# ls -ld /var/lib/libvirt/ drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 4. Jul 10:08 /var/lib/libvirt/ [root@vserver-a01 /]# ls -ld /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ drwxrwx--- 11 root root 4096 10. Jul 15:36 /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ It seems your guess is right. After [root@vserver-a01 /]# chmod a+x /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ [root@vserver-a01 /]# ls -ld /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ drwxrwx--x 11 root root 4096 10. Jul 15:41 /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/ it started: virsh # start collabora Domain collabora gestartet So that's a bug in the Arch Linux packaging? Who to tell? Thank you Martin, Pavel and Daniel for tracking that down. -- Regards, Stephan -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
