Re: [PATCH v2] test_driver: implement virDomainGetInterfaceParameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 10:46:32AM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:11 AM Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:01:04PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > The only thing changed since v1 is calling virDomainObjGetOneDef to get
> > > the appropriate def pointer.
> > >
> > >  src/test/test_driver.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > index 4b1f2724a0..dd756ed8bd 100755
> > > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > > @@ -1964,6 +1964,109 @@ static int testDomainGetInfo(virDomainPtr domain,
> > >      return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +testDomainGetInterfaceParameters(virDomainPtr dom,
> > > +                                 const char *device,
> > > +                                 virTypedParameterPtr params,
> > > +                                 int *nparams,
> > > +                                 unsigned int flags)
> > > +{
> > > +    size_t i;
> > > +    virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> > > +    virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
> > > +    virDomainNetDefPtr net = NULL;
> > > +    int ret = -1;
> > > +
> > > +    virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
> > > +                  VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
> > > +                  VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> > > +
> > > +    if ((*nparams) == 0) {
> > > +        *nparams = 7;
> > > +        return 0;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> > > +        return -1;
> > > +
> > > +    if (!(def = virDomainObjGetOneDef(vm, flags)))
> > > +        goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +    if (!(net = virDomainNetFind(def, device)))
> > > +        goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +    for (i = 0; i < *nparams && i < 7; i++) {
> > > +        switch (i) {
> > > +        case 0: /* inbound.average */
> > > +            if (virTypedParameterAssign(&params[i],
> > > +                                        VIR_DOMAIN_BANDWIDTH_IN_AVERAGE,
> > > +                                        VIR_TYPED_PARAM_UINT, 0) < 0)
> > > +                goto cleanup;
> > > +            if (net->bandwidth && net->bandwidth->in)
> > > +                params[i].value.ui = net->bandwidth->in->average;
> > > +            break;
> >
> >         Okay, we'll need a macro ^here too. Contrary to what I said in the
> >         response to the other GetXParameters, we don't need to make the macro
> >         too generic to suit every need, since in ^this particular case, we
> >         could also place the 'if' clause in it too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Erik
>
> Or we could collect the values in the beginning and then use the
> generic macro I suggested on the other e-mail. What do you think?

Sure, we could do that as well.

Erik

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux