On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:38:30PM +0200, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 6:15 PM Ilias Stamatis
> <stamatis.iliass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
the subject should say "Implement <function>"
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <stamatis.iliass@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > src/test/test_driver.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/test/test_driver.c b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > index 4b1f2724a0..215171839c 100755
> > --- a/src/test/test_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/test/test_driver.c
> > @@ -3293,6 +3293,53 @@ static int testDomainGetDiskErrors(virDomainPtr dom,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +
> > +static int
> > +testDomainGetPerfEvents(virDomainPtr dom,
> > + virTypedParameterPtr *params,
> > + int *nparams,
> > + unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > + virDomainObjPtr vm = NULL;
> > + virDomainDefPtr def = NULL;
> > + virTypedParameterPtr par = NULL;
> > + size_t i;
> > + int maxpar = 0;
> > + int npar = 0;
> > + int ret = -1;
> > +
> > + virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE |
> > + VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CONFIG |
> > + VIR_TYPED_PARAM_STRING_OKAY, -1);
> > +
> > + if (!(vm = testDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> > + goto cleanup;
> > +
> > + if (virDomainObjUpdateModificationImpact(vm, &flags) < 0)
> > + goto cleanup;
>
> Actually calling this function here is redundant since it is called
> also by virDomainObjGetOneDef just in the next line. So it can be
> removed before merging.
Hmm, good catch, looking at the code I don't see a reason for it either. I'll
drop the call before merging.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This redundant call is also done in the implementation of the same API
> from the QEMU driver, so it could probably be safely removed from
> there as well.
Care to send a patch for QEMU as well?
Erik
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
