On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 12:24:48 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 12:18 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:39:40 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > But what's the point of having it in git of libvirt? I can understand > > that we generate the docs from there. But we don't really need JS for > > the docs. > > > > The main page and everything is by itself pretty weird to be in > > libvirt.git > > That's kind of true, and has been slightly bothering me for a long > time now; however if you look at the website it's like 99% user and > developer documentation that we want to ship and ultimately install > as part of releases, with index.html and 404.html being the only > exceptions I can point out off the top of my head. There might be > a few more, but their size pales in comparison with the rest. > Splitting off those few pages to a separate repository would mean > having to duplicate a lot of effort (build system, etc.) for very > little gain at the end of the day, so I don't think it's something > that we should pursue. I must say that I mostly care about the JS stuff being gone from the repo. I don't mind other things that much.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
