On Mon, 2019-06-17 at 14:13 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: [...] > @@ -695,6 +695,11 @@ sc_require_whitespace_in_translation: > { echo '$(ME): missing whitespace at line split' 1>&2; \ > exit 1; } || : > > +cppi_banner = \ > + " *****************************************************\n" \ > + "* cppi not installed, some checks have been skipped *\n" \ > + "*****************************************************" > + > # Enforce recommended preprocessor indentation style. > sc_preprocessor_indentation: > @if cppi --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ > @@ -702,7 +707,7 @@ sc_preprocessor_indentation: > || { echo '$(ME): incorrect preprocessor indentation' 1>&2; \ > exit 1; }; \ > else \ > - echo '$(ME): skipping test $@: cppi not installed' 1>&2; \ > + echo -e "$(ME): skipping test $@:\n"$(cppi_banner) 1>&2; \ > fi > > # Enforce similar spec file indentation style, by running cppi on a > @@ -719,7 +724,7 @@ sc_spec_indentation: > || { echo '$(ME): incorrect preprocessor indentation' 1>&2; \ > exit 1; }; \ > else \ > - echo '$(ME): skipping test $@: cppi not installed' 1>&2; \ > + echo -e "$(ME): skipping test $@:\n"$(cppi_banner) 1>&2; \ > fi > > # Nested conditionals are easier to understand if we enforce that endifs How about this instead of all of the above? ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- @@ -1150,6 +1145,11 @@ ifneq ($(_gl-Makefile),) syntax-check: spacing-check test-wrap-argv \ prohibit-duplicate-header mock-noinline group-qemu-caps \ header-ifdef + @if ! cppi --version >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ + echo "*****************************************************" >&2; \ + echo "* cppi not installed, some checks have been skipped *" >&2; \ + echo "*****************************************************" >&2; \ + fi endif # Don't include duplicate header in the source (either *.c or *.h) ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- >8 ----- That is, keep briefly mentioning that a specific check has been skipped because cppi is unavailable as we're already doing, but also print a big fat warning *at the very end* so that you can't possibly miss it even if you have been paying no attention while the command was running. [...] > +# For 'make syntax-check' > +%if 0%{?fedora} > +BuildRequires: cppi > +%endif Pavel almost convinced me this is not appropriate for the spec file by pointing out that we're not actually running 'make syntax-check' when building the RPM, but Dan pointed out that it can be useful for people using 'dnf builddep' so it's kind of a toss-up... I'd probably slightly prefer dropping the hunk, especially once we have the big fat warning. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list