Re: Question about save and restore OVS per-port data in live migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/30/19 3:50 AM, wangxin (U) wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Michal Privoznik [mailto:mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 3:44 PM
To: wangxin (U) <wangxinxin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>; libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Lichunhe (Cloud Networking) <lichunhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Question about save and restore OVS per-port data in live
migration

On 5/29/19 6:23 AM, wangxin (U) wrote:
Hi

When we try to migrate a guest with 12 NICs, we find libvirt will try
to get per-port data in finish phase, it makes the guest paused for
several hundred milliseconds.

    qemuMigrationCookieAddNetwork
      -> virNetDevOpenvswitchGetMigrateData for per-nic
        -> run 'ovs-vsctl --if-exists get Interface vnetx external_ids:Port'
(about 25ms)

In our case, there's no portData available and it seems there is no need to
run the cmd.

Questions:
1. Is it necessary to get/set per-port data in migration finish phase? It will
increase the downtime.
2. Is there any way (i.e. a switch) to not run the OVS cmd if there's no
portData available?


IIUC migrating port data is required for openvswitch functionality on
the destination. Although looking at the commit that introduced this
does not say that explicitly (v1.0.0-rc1~8). But I vaguely recall that
being the case. We should revisit that decission and ask ovd guys if
that's still the case.

It will be helpful to do this.

And, is there a special reason to migrating port data in finish phase?
The finish phase should be as simple as possible.

Well, finish phase is the phase where we want to do this. Because until finish phase the domain is running on the source and if we'd transfer OVS private state before then there would be two different states - one on the source the other at the destination and we can't tell which one is valid. BTW this is exactly what's done with spice migration too. Well, qemu does it for us. But libvirt still has to wait for qemu to transfer spice internal state.

Anyway, let me ask OVS guys.

Done here:

https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/2019-May/048739.html

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux