On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 05:54:41PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-04-05 at 16:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> [...]
> > + } else if (what == "devs") {
> > + form.setAttribute("action", "https://google.com/search";);
> > + newq.setAttribute("name", "q");
> > + newq.value = "site:redhat.com inurl:/archives/libvir-list " + q.value;
> > + } else if (what == "users") {
> > + form.setAttribute("action", "https://google.com/search";);
> > + newq.setAttribute("name", "q");
> > + newq.value = "site:redhat.com inurl:/archives/libvirt-users " + q.value;
> > + }
>
> It seems like
>
> site:redhat.com/archives/libvir-list
> site:redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users
>
> would work just as well, and at least to my eyes that looks less
> alien that what you have up there. Your version works too, though,
> so feel free to change it or leave it alone based on your personal
> preference.
>
> [...]
> > +++ b/docs/mobile.css
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > margin: 0px;
> > background: white;
> > padding: 0px;
> > + height: 2em;
> > }
> > #search form {
> > padding: 5px;
> > @@ -91,4 +92,10 @@
> > float: none;
> > margin-bottom: 2em;
> > }
> > + #advancedsearch {
> > + margin-top: 4em;
> > + border: 0px;
> > + background: white;
> > + color: black;
> > + }
> > }
>
> Oh boy, what is even going on with indentation in this file? It's
> one most insane indentation styles I've ever seen. Your additions
> are entirely consistent with existing code, though, so I'll just
> look the other way and try to forget what I've just witnessed.
It isn't that insane - it is just using tabs so it appears wierd when
your tab indent < 8. We should just extend our no-tabs checking to
cover the CSS too.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
