On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 11:29 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > As mentioned above, we rely on backports for the JRE, so while > > > we could simply disable the jessie-backport repository that would > > > leave us with some packages that are installed on the system but > > > can't be updated, a situation that I would not be particularly > > > comfortable with. > > > > Ah, so the problem isn't that Jessie has been moved to archive.debian.org, > > it is that the jessie-backports repo has been moved / EOLd. > > > > I'm fine with dropping Jessie given that we'll be dropping it in a couple > > of months anyway. > > Alright, I'll cook some patches then :) > > > We should spin up Buster to replace it too > > We've ever introduced support for unreleased operating systems in our > CI environment[1], and I'm not sure it would be a good idea to start > now... It seems to me like it would be pretty misleading. I think the fact that we've not done it in the past is a bug really, not really a good thing. Unless we have capacity problems, I don't see a good reason to avoid it, given that we already run the more flakey rawhide/sid distros. > Personally I'd just live with running tests on single Debian release > until Buster is actually out. > > > [1] Fedora Rawhide, Debian sid and FreeBSD -CURRENT don't count since > they're unreleased by definition :) Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
