Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Incremental backups, focus on API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:13:44 -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm fairly confident that these API are ready to go (that is, I've got
> qemu code in the wings to implement these API for the qemu driver, as
> demonstrated at last KVM forum, and it shouldn't be too hard to add
> support in the test driver to get some 'make check' coverage similar
> to what I recently added for snapshots). I'm hoping the APIs make it
> in for 5.2, even if I'm still dealing with review churn on the later
> parts of my v5 series (there has been a lot of rebasing from earlier
> review comments, so v5 is currently still the most recent version that
> I was able to run demos with, although I hope to post the rest of v6
> soon).

I'm still not persuaded that pushing any API without implementation is a
good idea. (No, test driver implementation does not count). If the
consensus of others is that it's good to go then go ahead, but I want to
voice this concern here.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux