On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 07:46:33 +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: [...] > I'm with Igor on this one. I'm all for QEMU going the extra mile to > help libvirt, simply because that helps a very large fraction of our > users. I'm now asking libvirt to extend the courtesy back to QEMU. > > Please sit down and think earnestly about how to best soften the > compatibility promise you made so you can cope with changes we feel QEMU > has to make. The compatibility promise of libvirt can in this case go only as far as qemu is going to allow us. Obviously qemu dropping that option would not be nice unless libvirt has a contingency plan, but once it's gone we can't do much more. Libvirt needs to adapt as well so that we do our job of shielding users from inconsistencies of configuration. Peter Disclaimer: I did not think how to approach this in libvirt at this point.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
