On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 14:56:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 3/14/19 2:06 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 13:22:37 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: [...] > > Callers need to be fixed that in case when they choose not to ignore the > > error they report some error. > > > > You mean callers after I do what you suggest in 1/5 (where zpci will call > qemuMonitorDelDevice() directly)? Because after 4/5 there is only one caller > which doesn't want the error to be reported. And I guess you did not mean to > add some code here only to remove it in 4/5, did you? I still consider the case when 'device_del' fails but the event is not delivered to be a reporting-worthy problem due to a possible race when deleting backends of the removed device.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
