On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:29:14AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Except not really. At least for now. > > In the future, the firmware will be selected automagically. > Therefore, it makes no sense to require the pathname of a > specific firmware binary in the domain XML. But since it is not > implemented do not really allow the path to be NULL. Only move > code around to prepare it for further expansion. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 4 +++- > src/conf/domain_conf.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
