Re: [PATCH] iptablesSetupPrivateChains: Be forgiving if a table does not exist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/11/19 11:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:


What I mean is that this transaction is checking the filter, nat and
mangle tables of both ipv4 and ipv6. You have a missing mangle table
for ipv6, but this "ignore errors" policy means we'll even ignore
the missing "filter" table for ipv4 for example which is something we
have previously considered mandatory.

We will still get a failure later when the network is started though
I guess.

I know, and to me that's acceptable. It will not be any worse with this patch. Only better. Because right now we fail even for IPv6 even though you might not use it.

But fair enough. I'll post a patch documenting that IPv6 tables are required.

Michal

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux