On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 16:56:43 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:On Tue, 2019-03-05 at 15:38 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:[...]So I agree neither scenario is exactly perfect, but I still think adding non-transitional alias devices would overall be more user-friendly.I don't think it makes sense to add it at the qemu level. From libvirt's point of view users should be shielded from any qemu impl detail or inconsistency as libvirt is the 'user friendly'[1] layer. In qemu the devices would be the same and thus does not make sense to do that because it would be more confusing. You can argue that we should add the alias at the libvirt level though.
You can, but please don't. Jano
[1] Yes. I'm aware that statement is quite ironical.
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
