On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 04:07:40PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > At the moment, all VirtIO devices support model=virtio except > for SCSI controllers where model=virtio-scsi must be used > instead: get rid of this inconsistency by providing an alias > at the parser level, so that existing code keeps working but > using the same values across the board is also optionally > possible. > > Tweak one of the test cases to show that the new value is > accepted transparently, without altering any of the output > files in the process. As in previous discussions of a similar type, I'm against adding multiple names for the 100% functionally identical devices. Previous naming choices from the past might not have been the best in retrospect, but that's not a reason to make future XML docs incompatible with existing libvirt by adding a 2nd different name for something that's alread suppprted. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
