Introduce a helper for copying CPU signature between two CPU models. It's not very useful until the way we store signatures is changed in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Notes: Version 2: - separated from 11/26 cpu_x86: Allow multiple signatures for a CPU model src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c index 4dd10fb561..0be1b12cdb 100644 --- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c @@ -979,6 +979,16 @@ x86ModelFree(virCPUx86ModelPtr model) } +static int +x86ModelCopySignatures(virCPUx86ModelPtr dst, + virCPUx86ModelPtr src) +{ + dst->signature = src->signature; + + return 0; +} + + static virCPUx86ModelPtr x86ModelCopy(virCPUx86ModelPtr model) { @@ -986,13 +996,13 @@ x86ModelCopy(virCPUx86ModelPtr model) if (VIR_ALLOC(copy) < 0 || VIR_STRDUP(copy->name, model->name) < 0 || + x86ModelCopySignatures(copy, model) < 0 || x86DataCopy(©->data, &model->data) < 0) { x86ModelFree(copy); return NULL; } copy->vendor = model->vendor; - copy->signature = model->signature; return copy; } @@ -1178,8 +1188,8 @@ x86ModelParseAncestor(virCPUx86ModelPtr model, } model->vendor = ancestor->vendor; - model->signature = ancestor->signature; - if (x86DataCopy(&model->data, &ancestor->data) < 0) + if (x86ModelCopySignatures(model, ancestor) < 0 || + x86DataCopy(&model->data, &ancestor->data) < 0) return -1; return 0; -- 2.21.0 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list