On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 11:12 -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 1/29/19 11:05 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Eduardo, do you think we might ever get in trouble if we did that? > > For example, because of QEMU dropping transitional devices but > > leaving non-transitional devices in? > > I believe eduardo is offline for the next few weeks, so I'll make this > change in the next version to just track a single capability > QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_PCI_NON_TRANSITIONAL > > We can always add the fine grained capabilities later if needed. Sounds good, let's just make sure he has a chance to veto the approach *before* it ends up in a stable libvirt release, to avoid compatibility headaches in case we were wrong O:-) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
