On 31/01/19 09:40, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Maybe we should just add pflash block properties to the machine? And >> then it can create the devices if the properties are set to a non-empty >> value. > What exactly do you have in mind? Something like > > -machine q35,ovmf-code=OVMF-CODE-NODE,ovmf-data=OVMF-DATA-NODE > > where OVMF-CODE-NODE and OVMF-DATA-NODE are block backend node names, > i.e. > > -blockdev file,node-name=OVMF-CODE-NODE,read-only=on,filename=/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd > -blockdev file,node-name=OVMF-DATA-NODE,read-only=on,filename=... Yes, though I would call it pflash0 and pflash1. Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
