On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 09:27:51 -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 1/23/19 11:11 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > Allow callers use the new flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 4 ++-- > > src/qemu/qemu_security.c | 10 ++++++---- > > src/qemu/qemu_security.h | 6 ++++-- > > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Assuming previous comment/adjustment request to use int instead of > flag.... The "false"'s change to 0 and 'bool backingChain' to unsigned > int flags... Passing in the flags of the security driver at this level would be weird. At this point I'll keep the flag in the function header and convert it to the appropriate flags. I don't really see a point in adding yet another set of flags for the qemu_security stuff.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
