On 1/16/19 2:15 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581670 Add the Storage Pool and Volume API's defined for each generated capability output, such as: <pool> <type>dir</pool> <poolapis> <buildPool/> <refreshPool/> <deletePool/> </poolapis> <volapis> <buildVol/> <buildVolFrom/> <createVol/> <refreshVol/> <deleteVol/> <resizeVol/> <uploadVol/> <downloadVol/> <wipeVol/> </volapis> </pool> ... <pool> <type>iscsi</pool> <poolapis> <findPoolSources/> <startPool/> <refreshPool/> <stopPool/> </poolapis> <volapis> <uploadVol/> <downloadVol/> <wipeVol/> </volapis> </pool>
Frankly, I don't like this. Firstly, our users don't see 'uploadVol' they see 'virStorageVolUpload'. Secondly, I am not sure if we want to be introspectable this much. I mean, our users can just call the API and deal with VIR_ERR_NO_SUPPORT. This looks like an overkill to me.
Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
