On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 14:56, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Regarding OVMF, I kept the flash driver intentionally in the dark about > split vs. unified pflash, so OVMF will not care, as long as the same > GPAs behave the same as before. > > Regarding ArmVirtQemu, I'm not so sure. It think it already depends on > two separate pflash chips, through the DTB that QEMU exposes. So > unifying the chips (albeit with multiple regions) might actually confuse > the firmware. "virt" is a funny case because there is no underlying hardware that we're trying to match. So it is whatever we say it is and we've said it's two separate pflash chips. We don't need to change that I think. (IIRC this is derived partly from OVMF usecase requirements and partly from the vexpress devboards having 2 flash chips.) thanks -- PMM -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
