ping? Tks, John On 1/15/19 8:15 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > Although I suppose this could have been an RFC - I just went with > a v1. I would think at least the first 4 patches are non controversial. > Beyond that it depends on what is "expected" as output for the > capabilities output for the storage driver. > > John Ferlan (7): > conf: Extract host XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML > conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatHostXML to take virCapsHostPtr > conf: Extract guest XML formatting from virCapabilitiesFormatXML > conf: Alter virCapabilitiesFormatGuestXML to take virCapsGuestPtr > conf: Introduce storage pool functions into capabilities > storage: Process storage pool capabilities > storage: Add storage backend pool/vol API's to capability output > > src/conf/capabilities.c | 449 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > src/conf/capabilities.h | 19 ++ > src/conf/virstorageobj.h | 4 + > src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 + > src/storage/storage_backend.c | 65 +++++ > src/storage/storage_backend.h | 3 + > src/storage/storage_driver.c | 17 ++ > 7 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-) > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
