On 1/23/19 4:46 PM, Cole Robinson wrote: > This is a follow on from a discussion with Andrea here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-January/msg00750.html > > Most VIR_ENUM_IMPLS look like this: > > VIR_ENUM_IMPL(XXX, XXX, > "value1", > "value2"); > > But he and I find this format nicer: > > VIR_ENUM_IMPL(XXX, XXX, > "value1", > "value2", > ); Me too :) > > The latter format means new enum additions only trigger 1 line of > diff, vs 2 for the current common method. > > Since this patch series is already touching a lot of VIR_ENUM_IMPL > endings, now is as good a time as any to widely switch to that > format if others agree. > Do we have a syntax-check rule to enforce the new style? -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
