On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 04:45:07PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This partially reverts 00dc991ca167302c7a72f4fb16be061d05b12a32.
>
> 2,030 (1,456 direct, 574 indirect) bytes in 14 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 77 of 80
> at 0x4C30E96: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:711)
> by 0x50F83AA: virAlloc (viralloc.c:143)
> by 0x5178DFA: virPCIDeviceNew (virpci.c:1753)
> by 0x51753E9: virPCIDeviceIterDevices (virpci.c:468)
> by 0x5175EB5: virPCIDeviceGetParent (virpci.c:759)
> by 0x517AB55: virPCIDeviceIsBehindSwitchLackingACS (virpci.c:2476)
> by 0x517AC24: virPCIDeviceIsAssignable (virpci.c:2494)
> by 0x10BF27: testVirPCIDeviceIsAssignable (virpcitest.c:229)
> by 0x10D14C: virTestRun (testutils.c:174)
> by 0x10C535: mymain (virpcitest.c:422)
> by 0x10F1B6: virTestMain (testutils.c:1112)
> by 0x10CF93: main (virpcitest.c:455)
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/util/virpci.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virpci.c b/src/util/virpci.c
> index ef578bf774..fb22460bf5 100644
> --- a/src/util/virpci.c
> +++ b/src/util/virpci.c
> @@ -482,6 +482,8 @@ virPCIDeviceIterDevices(virPCIDeviceIterPredicate predicate,
> *matched = check;
I think that instead of adding a new condition block, we could do VIR_STEAL_PTR
^here and then...
> ret = 1;
> break;
> + } else {
> + virPCIDeviceFree(check);
> }
do virPCIDeviceFree(check) unconditionally. IMHO it would also look more clean.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
