On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 15:40 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:45:43PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > But I don't want to create unnecessary obstacles for libvirt, so > > if there's a real benefit in promising compatibility between both > > device types, we can still promise that on the QEMU side. > > I don't think there's an obstacle for libvirt, as I don't see any > compelling reason to avoid the new devices when we have QEMU >= 4.0. Alright, let's do it that way then. I still think it's important to maintain the relationship between old and new devices consistent going forward, because not doing so will certainly result in confusion for those using QEMU directly. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
