On 2019/1/16 下午4:16, Peter Krempa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 14:58:21 +0800, Luyao Zhong wrote:
original:
<devices>
<memory model='nvdimm'>
...
</memory>
<memory model='nvdimm'>
...
</memory>
</devices>
merge two examples above into one:
<devices>
<memory model='nvdimm'>
...
</memory>
</devices>
Signed-off-by: Luyao Zhong <luyao.zhong@xxxxxxxxx>
What's the benefit of the above change? We have multiple instances where
we show different configurations so I don't see a need to squash
every option together.
Thank you for your reply.
I modify this because the two different instances may mislead people to
think these are two mutually exclusive way to configure NVDIMM. Besides,
one example is enough to show all configurations and the description
bellow give the details.
Actually I thought it is a bug, because there was only one instance. I
added several options for the NVDIMM before but don't know why the one
instance was divided into two. :)
Thanks,
Luyao
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
