On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 12:52:20PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-December/msg00558.html > > Kept the subject the same, but the concept has been adjusted to follow > issues pointed out by jtomko vis-a-vis allowing arbitrary options via XML. > This series adds both the NFS and the RBD adjustments that were essentially > in the referenced series from review. Can you give any info about what motivated this addition. Anything that is implemented via a separate XML namespace is generally considered "unsupported, you're on your own when it breaks" so if this feature is neeeded for any management application like oVirt, OpenStack, etc, then using a custom namespace is not going to be a suitable approach. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
