On 12/18/18 5:34 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:55:46 -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Rather than chancing calling strchr when @err_noinfo == NULL or
>> calling virErrorTestMsgFormatInfoOne when @err_info == NULL, both
>> of which would fail, let's just return -1 immediately when we
>> encounter an error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> tests/virerrortest.c | 11 +++++------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> This would make the test hard to diagnose as it spits out one failure at
> time. I prefer you add the checks explicitly.
>
To avoid wasting steps/time w/ multiple iterations, you would rather
have the "err_noinfo &&" be a gate to strchr and "err_info &&" be a gate
to virErrorTestMsgFormatInfoOne?
So that the only diffs are:
- if (strchr(err_noinfo, '%')) {
+ if (err_noinfo && strchr(err_noinfo, '%')) {
and
- if (virErrorTestMsgFormatInfoOne(err_info) < 0)
+ if (err_info && virErrorTestMsgFormatInfoOne(err_info) < 0)
Tks -
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
