On 12/13/18 3:18 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/13/18 8:12 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 12/12/18 3:36 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/18 9:29 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>>> On 12/4/18 9:32 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>>>> If virSecretGetSecretString is using by secretLookupByUUID,
>>>>> then it's possible the found sec->usageType doesn't match the
>>>>> desired @secretUsageType. If this occurs for the encrypted
>>>>> volume creation processing and a subsequent pool refresh is
>>>>> executed, then the secret used to create the volume will not
>>>>> be found by the storageBackendLoadDefaultSecrets which expects
>>>>> to find secrets by VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_VOLUME.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a check to virSecretGetSecretString to avoid the possibility
>>>>> along with an error indicating the incorrect matched types.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone has an idea regarding how the usage could be filled
>>>>> in "properly" for the qemuxml2argvtest, I'm willing to give it
>>>>> a shot. However, fair warning trying to "mock" for tls, volume,
>>>>> iscsi, and ceph could be rather painful. Thus the NONE was the
>>>>> well, easiest way to go since the stored secret (ahem) shouldn't
>>>>> be of usageType "none" (famous last words).
>>>>>
>>>>> src/secret/secret_util.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>> tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 4 +++-
>>>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/src/secret/secret_util.c b/src/secret/secret_util.c
>>>>> index 16e43ab2cc..27e164a425 100644
>>>>> --- a/src/secret/secret_util.c
>>>>> +++ b/src/secret/secret_util.c
>>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,23 @@ virSecretGetSecretString(virConnectPtr conn,
>>>>> if (!sec)
>>>>> goto cleanup;
>>>>>
>>>>> + /* NB: NONE is a byproduct of the qemuxml2argvtest test mocking
>>>>> + * for UUID lookups. Normal secret XML processing would fail if
>>>>> + * the usage type was NONE and since we have no way to set the
>>>>> + * expected usage in that environment, let's just accept NONE */
>>>>> + if (sec->usageType != VIR_SECRET_USAGE_TYPE_NONE &&
>>>>> + sec->usageType != secretUsageType) {
>>>>> + char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + virUUIDFormat(seclookupdef->u.uuid, uuidstr);
>>>>> + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG,
>>>>> + _("secret with uuid %s is of type '%s' not "
>>>>> + "expected '%s' type"),
>>>>> + uuidstr, virSecretUsageTypeToString(sec->usageType),
>>>>> + virSecretUsageTypeToString(secretUsageType));
>>>>> + goto cleanup;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> I don't quite understand why this is needed. I mean, if
>>>> seclookupdef->type == VIR_SECRET_LOOKUP_TYPE_USAGE then this check is
>>>> done while looking the secret up. If seclookupdef->type ==
>>>> VIR_SECRET_LOOKUP_TYPE_UUID then this check feels odd; the caller wants
>>>> the secret by UUID and they don't care about the usage type.
>>>>
>>>> Is there an actual error you're seeing?
>>>>
>>>> Michal
>>>>
>>>
>>> Someone used an "iscsi" usage type secret by to create their luks
>>> encrypted volume. When using vol-dumpxml after creation the secret by
>>> usage existed. Then a pool-refresh caused the secret to disappear
>>> because on pool refresh the secret for a volume is refreshed by "volume"
>>> secret usage type. When I posted this patch, the bz didn't exist, but
>>> it does now, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656255
>>
>> Okay, this prevents users from defining a volume with mismatching secret
>> usage type. But I think the problem is also elsewhere - in the bug,
>> after the pool is refreshed the secret is lost from the volume XML and
>> therefore vol-create-from looks up multiple secrets and is confused.
>>
>> Michal
>>
>
> I responded to your needsinfo in the bz, but to more or less replay it
> here for those following along at home or work is the vol-create[-as]
> was incorrectly allowed to use an 'iscsi' secret (e.g. one meant as the
> passphrase to the iSCSI server) when creating the volume because the
> vol-create-as XML used the UUID to lookup the secret that was being used
> to create the volume instead of the "proper" action of making sure that
> the secret to be used was a "volume" secret.
>
> An example perhaps helps a lot... Assume a virsh secret-list entry having:
>
> ...
> 2a682ffe-2c95-43c3-8cdb-e690d407371e iscsi notPrivateSecret
> 1a2e881d-2e88-411c-b817-fd02bfa30bd5 volume /home/vm-images/encrypt1.img
> ...
>
> The output is:
>
> UUID usageType usageID
>
> where usageType is an enum type and usageID is a char* used along with
> UUID as one of the ways to lookup secrets. The unfortunate closeness of
> usageType and usageID has bitten me in the past too.
>
> Anyway, currently the code allows
>
> <encryption format='luks'>
> <secret type='passphrase'
> uuid='2a682ffe-2c95-43c3-8cdb-e690d407371e'/>
> </encryption>
>
> to be used as input in the volume XML when creating the volume when it
> should have been using:
>
> <encryption format='luks'>
> <secret type='passphrase'
> uuid='1a2e881d-2e88-411c-b817-fd02bfa30bd5'/>
> </encryption>
>
> to create the LUKS volume secret for /home/vm-images/encrypt1.img
>
> This patch "fixes" that by checking the "usageType" (e.g. that iscsi or
> volume field in the output) of the returned lookup by UUID matches the
> usageType "expected" used to create the volume. Creating a volume
> expects a usageType volume when calling virSecretGetSecretString to get
> the secret (see storageBackendCreateQemuImgSecretPath).
Ah, this helped. Thanks. ACK then.
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
