On 11/14/18 7:44 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > The TPM code currently accepts pointer to a domain definition. > This is okay for now, but in near future the security driver APIs > it calls will require domain object. Therefore, change the TPM > code to accept the domain object pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/qemu/qemu_extdevice.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > src/qemu/qemu_extdevice.h | 4 ++-- > src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 6 +++--- > src/qemu/qemu_security.c | 14 +++++++------- > src/qemu/qemu_security.h | 4 ++-- > src/qemu/qemu_tpm.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------ > src/qemu/qemu_tpm.h | 4 ++-- > 7 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> John At one time I really hoped we could make the obj's transparent to callers and force usage of virDomainObjGetDef, but I know that's a sheer impossibility! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
