Re: [PATCH 00/11] Allow modification of IOThread polling values (redux)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ping?

Any takers or thoughts?

Tks,

John


On 10/7/18 9:00 AM, John Ferlan wrote:
> This series attempts to resurrect the concept of being able to modify
> the IOThread polling parameters; however, in a slightly different
> manner than the previous series posted by posted by Pavel Hrdina
> <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2017-February/msg01047.html
> 
> The work is prompted by continued pleas found in the bz:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545732
> 
> to provide some way to modify the paremters without needing to supply
> QEMU command line pass through values.
> 
> It's accepted that the values being changed are fairly or extremely
> low level type knobs; however, it's also shown that by being able to
> turn the knob it is possible for certain, specific appliances to be
> able to gain a performance benefit for the thread at the expense of
> other competing threads.
> 
> Unlike the previous series, this series does not attempt to save the
> polling values in the guest XML. Rather, it only modifies the live
> guest's IOThread with new values. It also doesn't provide the polling
> values in a virsh iothread* command, rather it uses the domstats
> in order to fetch and display the values. The theory being this
> leaves the onus on the higher level appliance/application to provide
> the "proper guidance" and "concerns" related to changing the values
> to the consumer. Not saving the values means whatever values that
> are chosen do not "live" in perpetuity. Once the guest is shut down
> or the IOThread removed from guest, the hypervisor default values
> take over again. Perhaps not a perfect situation in terms of what
> the bz requests; however, storage of default values that could
> cause performance issues is not an optimal situation. So this I
> figured is a "comprimise" of sorts.
> 
> If it's still felt that no we don't want to do this, then fine,
> but please in doing so own the bz, state your case, and close it.
> I'm 50/50 on it, but figured at least I'd present this option and
> see what the concensus was.
> 
> John Ferlan (11):
>   qemu: Check for and return IOThread polling values if available
>   qemu: Split qemuDomainGetIOThreadsLive
>   qemu: Implement the ability to return IOThread stats
>   virsh: Add ability to display IOThread stats
>   lib: Introduce virDomainSetIOThreadParams
>   qemu: Add monitor functions to set IOThread params
>   qemu: Alter qemuDomainChgIOThread to take enum instead of bool
>   qemu: Alter qemuDomainChgIOThread to take qemuMonitorIOThreadInfo
>   qemu: Detect whether iothread polling is supported
>   qemu: Introduce qemuDomainSetIOThreadParams
>   tools: Add virsh iothreadset command
> 
>  include/libvirt/libvirt-domain.h              |  45 ++
>  src/driver-hypervisor.h                       |   8 +
>  src/libvirt-domain.c                          | 109 +++++
>  src/libvirt_public.syms                       |   5 +
>  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c                  |   2 +
>  src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h                  |   1 +
>  src/qemu/qemu_driver.c                        | 393 ++++++++++++++++--
>  src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c                       |  19 +
>  src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h                       |   6 +
>  src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c                  |  48 +++
>  src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h                  |   4 +
>  src/remote/remote_driver.c                    |   1 +
>  src/remote/remote_protocol.x                  |  21 +-
>  src/remote_protocol-structs                   |  10 +
>  .../caps_2.10.0.aarch64.xml                   |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.10.0.ppc64.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.10.0.s390x.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.10.0.x86_64.xml                    |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.11.0.s390x.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.11.0.x86_64.xml                    |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.12.0.aarch64.xml                   |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.12.0.ppc64.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.12.0.s390x.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.12.0.x86_64.xml                    |   1 +
>  .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.9.0.ppc64.xml |   1 +
>  .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_2.9.0.s390x.xml |   1 +
>  .../caps_2.9.0.x86_64.xml                     |   1 +
>  .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.0.0.ppc64.xml |   1 +
>  .../caps_3.0.0.riscv32.xml                    |   1 +
>  .../caps_3.0.0.riscv64.xml                    |   1 +
>  .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.0.0.s390x.xml |   1 +
>  .../caps_3.0.0.x86_64.xml                     |   1 +
>  tools/virsh-domain-monitor.c                  |   7 +
>  tools/virsh-domain.c                          | 110 +++++
>  tools/virsh.pod                               |  47 ++-
>  35 files changed, 810 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux