On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:11:28AM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 09:31 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > I've looked at clang-format before and it is pretty good. It does not > > have ability to quite match our code style, but I don't think that > > is a real show stopper. We'd be better off just adapting to one of > > the common code styles rather than inventing yet another app todo > > code indent analysis. > > I *strongly* support this idea :) The other benefit of clang-format is that it can actually fix the code automatically, as well as reporting on the problem. Our syntax check tool merely reports the problem leaving the developer tedious work to fix each problem. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
