On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:13:30PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 10/2/18 4:50 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > On 9/30/18 8:15 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > Since this is something between PV and HVM, it makes sense to put the > > > setting in place where domain type is specified. > > > To enable it, use <os><type machine="xenpvh">...</type></os>. It is > > > also included in capabilities.xml, for every supported HVM guest type - it > > > doesn't seems to be any other requirement (besides new enough Xen). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v2 proposed by Jim: > > > - use new_arch_added var instead of i == nr_guest_archs for clarity > > > - improve comment > > > - adjust for now required Xen >= 4.6 (remove part for Xen < 4.5) > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - limit VIR_DOMAIN_OSTYPE_XEN -> VIR_DOMAIN_OSTYPE_LINUX conversion to > > > Xen PV only > > > - do not accept VIR_DOMAIN_OSTYPE_LINUX for PVH > > > - fix reported capabilities for PVH - remove hostdev passthrough and > > > video/graphics > > > > No video, graphics or hostdev passthrough - bummer. Begs the question: > > what to do with PVH XML config containing these devices? Reject it? > > Silently ignore? I'll also need to remember to enable these as PVH gains > > support for the devices. > > > > > - use #ifdef LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_PVH instead of hypervisor version to > > > check for PVH support > > > > This is a much better approach than the version check. I should have > > thought of that earlier, sorry. > > Actually it is not. LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_PVH is a value in the enum > libxl_domain_type. Too bad PVH support isn't advertised in libxl.h with > something like LIBXL_HAVE_PVH. Looks like we are stuck with the version > check :-(. Hmm, but that version check is a runtime check. How to fix compile error regarding missing LIBXL_DOMAIN_TYPE_PVH then? Let configure check that and define some HAVE_xxx? -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
