On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 17:26 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 16:43:04 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: [...] > > Eh, nothing in this series is really meant to be pushed :) > > Such approach without any obvious markers is only warranted on 1st of > April. I figured the series being marked as RFC, along with the cover letter containing a "Known issues" section mentioning how the implementation completely fails to work in one out of two sample scenarios, would be enough to tip readers off. How do you recommend I make it more obvious next time? -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
